Войти Регистрация

Docx

  • Рефераты
  • Дипломные работы
  • Прочее
    • Презентации
    • Рефераты
    • Курсовые работы
    • Дипломные работы
    • Диссертациии
    • Образовательные программы
    • Инфографика
    • Книги
    • Тесты

Информация о документе

Цена 12000UZS
Размер 64.5KB
Покупки 0
Дата загрузки 16 Апрель 2024
Расширение docx
Раздел Курсовые работы
Предмет Английский язык

Продавец

Bohodir Jalolov

Modality in Modern English

Купить
1MINISTRY   OF   HIGHER   EDUCATION,   SCIENCE   AND   INNOVATIONS   OF   THE
REPUBLIC   OF UZBEKISTAN
SAMARKAND   STATE   INSTITUTE   OF   FOREIGN   LANGUAGES   FACULTY   OF
ENGLISH   PHILOLOGY   AND   TRANSLATION STUDIES
DEPARTMENT   OF   ENGLISH   PHILOLOGY
THEME   :   Modality   in   Modern   English
COURSE   WORK
Specialty:   60230100-Philology   and   teaching   languages   (English   language)
Samarkand 2CONTENT
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3
CHAPTER   I   CLASSIFICATION   OF   MODALITY   IN   MODERN   ENGLISH
1.1 General   information   about   modality   in   English ............................................................ 7
1.2 Theoretical   problems   regarding   modality   and   the   classification   of   modal  
meaning ............................................................................................................................. 12
Conclusion   on   chapter   I ..................................................................................................... 16
CHAPTER   II   THE   IMPORTANCE   OF   MODALITY   IN   MODERN   ENGLISH
2.1 The   uses   of modality   and   mood in   Modern   English   language. ................................... 27
2.2 Role   of   adverbs   and   adjectives   in   expressing   modality ............................................. 22
Conclusion   on   chapter   II ................................................................................................... 28
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 29
LIST   OF   USED   LITERATURE. ................................................................................... 31
INTERNET   RESOURCES. ........................................................................................... 32 3INTRODUCTION
"We  all  understand   well   that   education  and  upbringing  are   of  decisive   importance
not only in today's life, but also for the future of any state and society’. Admittedly, We
personally have set as our vital aims in order to create   a new   foundation for a new era of
renewing   in   Uzbekistan,   for   New   Revival,   by   the   way   of   large-scale   democratical
foundations,   including   educational   reforms,   the   head   of   our   state   said.   To   this   end,
radical   reforms   are   being   carried   out   in   the   education   system.   A   completely   new   system
is being created on the ground - the Presidential and Creative Schools, special schools in
mathematics,   chemistry   and   biological   sciences.   Every   day,   the   number   of   educational
institutions   is   growing,   in   which   young   people   are   trained   in   depth   in   IT
technologies,   ”said   Shavkat   Mirziyoyev 1
.
In   modern   English,   modality   refers   to   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   the   likelihood
or   necessity   of   a   situation.   There   are   various   means   through   which   modality   can   be
expressed in English, including modal verbs, phrasal modals, adverbs, adjectives, modal
expressions,   infinitive   constructions,   conditional   sentences,   and   the   subjunctive   mood.
1. Modal Verbs: Modal verbs such as "can," "could," "may," "might," "shall," "should,"
"will," "would," "must," and "ought to" are commonly used to express  modality. These
verbs   indicate   the   speaker's   opinion   on   the   likelihood   or   necessity   of   an   action.
2. Phrasal  Modals:  Phrasal  modals are combinations of verbs and particles that  express
modality.   Examples   include   "have   to,"   "need   to,"   "be   able   to,"   and   "be   supposed   to."
Phrasal   modals   convey   similar   meanings   to   standalone   modal   verbs   but   may   offer
additional   nuances.
3. Adverbs   and   Adjectives:   Adverbs   and   adjectives   play   a   crucial   role   in   expressing
modality   by   indicating   the   degree   of   certainty   or   possibility.   Words   like   "certainly,"
1
  President   Shavkat   Mirziyoyev’s   speech   at   the festive   event   held   on   Teacher   and   Mentor’s   Day-   “Xalq   so’zi”,
2020-100p. 4"possibly,"   "likely,"   "probably,"   "surely,"   "perhaps,"   and   "unlikely"   help   convey   the
speaker's attitude   towards   a   situation.
4. Modal   Expressions:   Modal   expressions   are   phrases   or   idiomatic   expressions   that
convey modality. Examples include "as far as I know," "it seems that," "I believe," and "I
think." These expressions provide insight into the speaker's perspective on the likelihood
or   necessity   of an   event.
5. Infinitive   Constructions:   Infinitive   constructions   with   modal   verbs   can   also   express
modality in English. For instance, "to be able to," "to have to," and "to be supposed to"
are   examples   of   how   infinitive   constructions   can   convey   different   shades   of   meaning
related to   modality.
6. Conditional   Sentences:   Conditional   sentences   are   another   means   of   expressing
modality   by   presenting   hypothetical   or   speculative   situations.   Different   types   of
conditional   sentences,   such   as   zero,   first,   second,   and   third   conditionals,   allow   speakers
to communicate   varying   degrees   of possibility   and   necessity.
7. Subjunctive   Mood:   The   subjunctive   mood   is   used   in   English   to   express   wishes,
recommendations, suggestions, or hypothetical situations. It is often employed to convey
attitudes towards   possibility   and   necessity   that   differ   from   factual statements.
By   utilizing   these   various   means   of   expressing   modality   in   modern   English,
speakers   can   effectively   communicate   their   opinions,   beliefs,   predictions,   and   attitudes
towards   the   likelihood   or   necessity   of   events   or   actions.   Understanding   and   mastering
these linguistic tools can enhance clarity and precision in expressing one's viewpoint in
different   contexts.   Furthermore,   the   theoretical   value   of   means   of   expressing   modality
extends   to   fields   such   as   pragmatics,   discourse   analysis,   and   sociolinguistics.   By
examining how speakers use modal expressions in different contexts and social settings,
researchers   can   uncover   patterns   of   communication   that   reflect   cultural   norms,   power
dynamics, and social relationships. The study of modality can also reveal how speakers
negotiate   meaning,   establish   rapport,   and   convey   politeness   in   their   interactions   with 5others. In sum, the theoretical value of means of expressing modality in modern English
lies in their role as a window into the complexities of human language and cognition. By
exploring the diverse ways in which speakers convey their attitudes and beliefs through
modal  expression   researchers   can  gain a  deeper  understanding  of  how  language  shapes
our   perceptions   of   the   world   and   influences   our   social   interactions.   Modal   verbs   are
verbs that express possibility, necessity, or permission. They include verbs such as can,
could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, and would. Modal auxiliaries are verbs that
are used to help other verbs express modality. They include verbs such as be able to, be
going   to,   be   likely   to,   be   supposed   to,   and   have   to.   Modal   adverbs   are   adverbs   that
express  modality.  They  include adverbs  such  as   certainly,  definitely,  perhaps,  possibly,
probably,   and   surely.   Modality   is   an   important   feature   of   language   because   it   allows
speakers to express their attitudes towards the propositions they are expressing. Modality
can   be   used   to   indicate   certainty,   possibility,   necessity,   permission,   and   other   attitudes
The   subject   of   the   course   work.   The   aim   of   utilizing   different   means   of   expressing
modality in modern English is to convey the speaker's attitude towards the likelihood or
necessity of a situation with clarity and precision. By using modal verbs, phrasal modals,
adverbs,   adjectives,   modal   expressions,   infinitive   constructions,   conditional   sentences,
and the subjunctive mood, speakers can effectively communicate their opinions, beliefs,
predictions,   and   attitudes   towards   events   or   actions.   Ultimately,   the   aim   of   utilizing
various   means   of   expressing   modality   in   modern   English   is   to   facilitate   effective
communication   by   accurately   conveying   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   different
situations and   providing context for   the   interpretation of   their   statements.
The object of the course paper.  These linguistic tools allow speakers to express varying
degrees   of   certainty,   possibility,   obligation,   permission,   ability,   necessity,   and
willingness in their language. By choosing the appropriate means of expressing modality,
speakers can convey nuanced shades of meaning and accurately reflect their perspective
on   a   given   situation.   Moreover,   mastering   the   different   ways   of   expressing   modality   in 6English   enables   speakers   to   enhance   the   overall   coherence   and   effectiveness   of   their
communication.   It   helps   in   avoiding   ambiguity,   ensuring   that   the   intended   message   is
conveyed clearly and that the listener  or  reader  understands the speaker's  stance on the
likelihood or   necessity   of an   event.
Theoretical   value   of   the   course   work.   The   theoretical   value   of   means   of   expressing
modality   in   modern   English   lies   in   their   ability   to   capture   the   complexities   of   human
language and cognition. Modality is a fundamental aspect of human communication, as it
allows speakers to convey their attitudes, beliefs, and judgments about the world around
them.   By   utilizing   different   means   of   expressing   modality,   speakers   can   navigate   the
nuances   of   language   and   communicate   their   perspectives   with   precision   and   subtlety.
Practical value of the course paper.   From a linguistic perspective, the study of modal
expressions provides insights into the underlying structure and organization of language.
It allows researchers to explore how speakers encode uncertainty, necessity, possibility,
and other modal concepts in their speech and writing. Understanding the various ways in
which   modality   is   expressed   in   English   can   shed   light   on   the   cognitive   processes
involved in   language   production   and   comprehension.
The   structure   of   the   work.   The   term   paper   consists   of   an   introduction,   two   sections,
conclusion and the list of references. The significance of the theme, aims, objectives, the
theoretical and practical significance of the term paper are found in the preface of course
work. 7CHAPTER   I   CLASSIFICATION   OF   MODALITY   IN   MODERN   ENGLISH
1.1 General   information   about modality   in   English
There are several  ways and means of expressing modality in English, which allow
speakers   to   convey   their   attitudes,   beliefs,   and   judgments   about   the   likelihood   or
necessity   of   events   or   states.   Here   are   some   common   ways   in   which   modality   is
expressed in English.   Modal verbs: Modal verbs are a type of auxiliary verb that express
modality. Examples  of   modal  verbs  in  English  include  "can,"  "could,"  "may,"  "might,"
"shall," "should," "will," "would," "must," and "ought to." These verbs indicate different
degrees of   possibility,   necessity,   permission,   ability,   and   obligation 2
.
Modal   adverbs:   Adverbs   such   as   "possibly,"   "probably,"   "certainly,"   "likely,"
"perhaps,"   and   "definitely"   are   used   to   express   modality   by   indicating   the   speaker's
degree   of   certainty   or   uncertainty   about   a   statement.   Modal   adjectives:   Adjectives   like
"possible,"   "probable,"   "certain,"   "unlikely,"   and   "impossible"   convey   modality   by
describing   the   likelihood   or   impossibility   of   a   particular   event   or   state.   Modal
expressions:   Phrases   such   as   "it   is   likely   that,"   "it   is   possible   that,"   "it   seems   that,"   "it
appears that," and "it must be the case that" are used to express modality by signaling the
speaker's attitude or belief towards a statement.   Modal constructions: Complex sentence
structures, such as conditional sentences (e.g., "If I were you, I would go"), subjunctive
clauses (e.g., "I wish he were here"), and hypothetical statements  (e.g., "If it were true,
then.")   are   used   to   express   modality   by   indicating   hypothetical   or   counterfactual
situations.   Modal  particles:  Words   like  "perhaps,"  "maybe,"  "possibly,"  and  "probably"
can   function   as   modal   particles   in   English   sentences,   adding   a   sense   of   uncertainty   or
possibility   to   the   statement.   Modal   auxiliaries:   In   addition   to   modal   verbs,   other   auxiliary
2
 Almurzaeva, P. Kh. Modal words in sentences with modal verbs. “Science and Youth”. In Materials of the All-
Russian scientific-practical conference of young scientists, graduate students and students of Chechen State  
University.   2011. 86–90   p. 8verbs like "have to," "need to," and "ought to" can also express modality by indicating
necessity, obligation, or recommendation. These are just a few examples of the ways and
means   of   expressing   modality   in   English.   By   using   a   combination   of   modal   verbs,
adverbs, adjectives,  expressions,  constructions,  and particles, speakers can convey their
nuanced attitudes   and   beliefs   about   the world around   them.
Modality is an area of meaning that is often defined by example: the term ‘modality’  
is a cover term for a range of semantic notions such as ability, possibility, hypotheticality,  
obligation and imperative   meaning.   This   is a   serviceable   definition   for practical   purposes.  
If,   however,   we   wish   to   provide   a   more   theoretically   useful   definition,   we   need   to   find  
what   it   is   that   all   modal   utterances   have   in   common.   This   turns   out   to   be   by   no   means  
evident.   What, for   example,   does   the   imperative   mood, whose   prototypical   function   is   to  
convey   a   command,   have   in   common   with   the   auxiliary   verb   can   in   its   meaning   of  
‘ability’,   or   the   auxiliary   verb   might   when   it   expresses   a   type   of   possibility   meaning,   as  
in   You   might   be   right   about   that?   What   does   the   hypothetical   meaning   of   a   sentence   like  
If   the   dog   lost   a   bit   of   weight   it   could   use   the   cat-flap   have   in   common   with   the  
obligation meaning   of You   have   to   pay   to   get   in?
One   feature   that   is   common   to   all   modal   utterances   is   that   they   do   not   represent
situations as straightforward facts. However, the wealth of literature on modality would
seem to suggest that linguists intuitively feel that modality is something semantically far
richer than ‘lack of factuality’. We can get nearer to a positive characteristics of modality
if   we   say   that   modal   meaning   crucially   involves   the   notions   of   necessity   and   possibility
or rather, involves a speaker’s judgement that a proposition is possibly or necessarily true
or   that   the   actualisation   of   a   situation   is   necessary   or   possible.   But   more   semantically
precise links between such meanings as we mention above are not forthcoming. In what
follows, we shall work on the basis that all modal utterances are non-factual, in that they
do   not   assert   that   the   situations   they   describe   are   facts,   and   all   involve   the   speaker’s
comment   on   the   necessity   or   possibility   of   the   truth   of   a   proposition   or   the   actualisation 9of   a   situation.   Modality   may   be   coded   in   various   ways,   including   verbal   inflections,
auxiliary verbs, adverbs and particles. The grammatical coding of modal meaning in verb
inflections   is   known   as   mood.   English   makes   relatively   little   use   of   inflectional   systems
to   express   modal   meanings:   the   imperative   mood   is   common   in   English,   and   there   is
limited use of the subjunctive mood, but  modality in English is primarily expressed  by
non-inflectional items. A very important means of expressing modality in English is the
set of modal auxiliary verbs such as can, might and must, and a considerable part of this
chapter   will   be   concerned   with   the   meanings   expressed   by   these   auxiliaries.   We   will
begin, however, with a brief look at mood in English. Traditionally, a distinction is made
between   central   modals   (can,   could,   may,   might,   shall,   should,   will,   would,   must)   and
peripheral or marginal modals (dare, need, ought). In addition, we find a group of verbs
referred to as semi-modals, quasi-modals, emergent modals or periphrastic modals. This
somewhat open-ended category includes have to, need to, have got to (gotta), be able to,
be going to, but can also include a variety of other verbs such as be supposed to, be about
to,   be bound   to,   want   to   (wanna)   and   had   better 3
.
The   central   modals   have   all   the   ‘nice’   properties   that   are   criterial   to   the
classification   of   a   form   as   an   auxiliary   verb.   That   is,   they   have   a   negative   form
consisting of the auxiliary followed by not, they can precede the subject in subject-verb
inversion   (for   example   in   interrogatives),   they   can   occur   in   ‘code’,   they   can   be   used
instead of a full lexical verb which has occurred in the context (for example She will help
and   so   will   I),   and   they   can   be   used   in   emphatic   affirmation.   This   means   that   unlike
lexical verbs they do not require the use of do in such contexts. In addition, unlike lexical
verbs the central modals are invariable for person and number, they have no third person
singular   forms   and   have   no   non-finite   forms.   In   English   analytic   modality,   we   can   make
3
  Almurzaeva,   P.   Kh.   Expression   of   the   future   of   the   German   modal   verb   “wollen”   in   the   fiction.   In   Materials   of  
the   All-Russian scientific-practical conference "Linguistics and intercultural communication", dedicated to the 80th  
anniversary   of   the Chechen   State University, 2018.   27–30   p. 10an initial distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic, or root modality. Both types
of   modality   have   as   their   basis   the   notions   of   necessity   and   possibility,   but   the   former
deals with the necessity or possibility of the truth (or non-truth) of propositions while the
latter deals with the necessity  or possibility of the actualisation of situations. Epistemic
modality reflects the speaker’s judgment of the likelihood that the proposition underlying
the   utterance   is   true,   the   epistemic   scale   of   likelihood   ranging   from   weak   epistemic
possibility   (That   may   be   John)   to   epistemic   necessity   (That   must   be   John   ,   ‘it   is
necessary that [that is John] is true’ and That can’t be John = ‘it is necessary that [that is
not   John]   is   true’).   Root   modality   reflects   the   speaker’s   judgements   about   factors
influencing   the   actualisation   of   the   situation   referred   to   in   the   utterance.   Within   root
modality   we   find   root   possibility,   root   necessity   and   two   categories   that   are   normally
treated separately   within   root modality,   namely   ability   and   volition.
Cutting   across   the   root   necessity   and   root   possibility   categorisation   is   the   category
of deontic modality, which includes obligation   a type of root necessity   and permission
a type of root possibility. Deontic modality typically refers to ‘the necessity or possibility
of   acts   performed   by   morally   responsible   agents’.   Deontic   modality   also   implies   an
authority,   or   ‘deontic   source’   which   may   be   a   person,   a   set   of   rules,   or   something   as
vague as a social norm     responsible for imposing the necessity (obligation) or granting
the   possibility   (permission).   It   differs   from   epistemic   possibility   in   that   it   does   not   imply
a speaker’s evaluation of how possible it is that some proposition is true but rather refers
to   the   effect   of   circumstances   on   the   possibility   of   actualisation   of   some   situation;   it
differs   from   ability   in   that   it   refers   to   possibility   arising   out   of   enabling   or   disabling
circumstances   outside   the   subject   referent,   as   opposed   to   enabling   or   disabling   factors
that are entirely internal to the subject referent.   The non-deontic root possibility meaning
of Can you come tomorrow? can thus be paraphrased by ‘is it possible for you to come
tomorrow?’   plus   ‘are   there   any   external   circumstances   preventing   you   or   do   external
circumstances   allow   you   to   do   so?’.   Finally,   we   come   to   ability   and   volition.   These 11modalities,   too,   combine   the   meaning   of   possibility   with   the   notion   of   specific   factors
affecting that possibility. The ability meaning of Can you climb over that wall?, can be
paraphrased   by   ‘is   it   possible   for   you   to   climb   over   that   wall?’   plus   ‘do   you   have   the
physical   (and   perhaps   mental)   abilities   and   skills   to   make   it   possible?’.   The   volition
meaning of I’ll help you can be paraphrased by ‘It is possible for me to help you’ and ‘I
am willing and intend to do so. Partly due to the fact that, in classifying modal meanings,
it   is   possible   to   use   various   parameters   as   criterial   to   their   classification,   there   exists   in
the   literature   a   fairly   diverse assortment of   classifications of   modal   meaning 4
.
Below we outline a few of the recent approaches to classifying modality in English.
Coates’ (analysis of English modal auxiliaries leads her to a basic two-way split between
epistemic  modality and  root   modality. Her   examination of  corpus  examples  shows  that
root   modals   taken   as   a   whole   differ   from   epistemic   modals   in   systematic   ways:   root
modals have  shared semantic  syntactic  features,  typically,  for  example, having animate
and   agentive   subjects,   and   they   are   linked   by   similarities   in   intonation   patterns   which
distinguish   them   from   epistemic   modals.   However,   Coates   does   not   merely   argue   that
root   modalities   are   in   important   ways   homogeneous   in   their   difference   from   epistemic
modalities,   but   also   that   the  various   types   of   root   modality  should   not   be  grouped   into
subcategories   such   as   ‘deontic’   modality.   Such   subcategorisation,   she   argues,   would
obscure   the   fact   that   there   exist   deontic   and   non-deontic   meanings   of   a   single   modal
auxiliary which form a single spectrum of meaning, rather than being discrete meanings.
Quirk distinguish between intrinsic and extrinsic modality. This classification cuts across
the root-epistemic division. Extrinsic modality involves ‘human judgment of what is or is
not likely to happen’   and covers (epistemic and non-deontic root) possibility, (epistemic
and nondeontic root)  necessity  and prediction, whilst  intrinsic  modality involves  ‘some
kind   of   intrinsic   human   control   over   events’.   Deontic   modality   and   volition   are
4
  Ardiansah,   D.   Analysis   of   Modality   in   Students’   Hortatory   Exposition   Texts   .Systemic   Functional   Grammar  
Perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan   Bahasa , 2020. 89-100   p. 12categorised together as intrinsic modality. As for ability, the authors note: ‘The ‘ability’
meaning   of   can   is   considered   extrinsic,   even   though   ability   typically   involves   human
control over an action’ . For Quirk , an assertion or question about a being’s ability to do
something   implies   some   sort   of   judgement   about   the   likelihood   of   actualisation   of   the
situation,   and   it   is   this   aspect   of   ability   meaning   that   informs   their   categorisation   of
ability as extrinsic.   In contrast, epistemic modality, as Bybee and Fleischman point out,
concerns the truth of the proposition as a whole, and rather than relating an agent to an
action, it deals with the speaker’s commitment to the truth of the proposition. The group
of   modalities   referred   to   by   Coates   as   ‘root’   modality   are   referred   to   by   Bybee   and
Fleischman as agent oriented modality, in order to reflect the shared semantic feature on
which their categorisation   is   based 5
.
1.2 Theoretical   problems   regarding   modality   and   the   classification   of
modal   meaning
Modal   auxiliaries   (including   peripheral   modals   and   semi-modals)   in   English   are
notably   susceptible   to   evolution,   both   in   terms   of   their   meaning   and   in   terms   of   their
grammatical   behaviour,   which   may   affect   the   approximation   of   peripheral   or   semi-
modals   to   the   status   of   central   modal.   This   variability   across   time   requires   care   in
handling   corpus   material   in   the   analysis   of   a   given   modal.   In   addition,   the   semantic
diversity   of   the   meanings   that   have   been   classed   as   modal   and   the   somewhat   fuzzy
boundaries of modality naturally bring some difficulties of analysis with them. Questions
arise  about,  on  the  one  hand,   which  modal   verbs,  in  which  uses,  count  semantically  as
modal, and on the other hand, which meanings themselves count as modal. We mention
below   two   of   the   most   common   issues   regarding   the   classification   of   English   modal
auxiliaries   and   their   meanings.   One   well-known   debate   concerns   the   question   of   whether
5
  Belyaeva,   E.   I.   Functional   semantic   fields   of   modality   in   English   and   Russian.   Voronezh:   Publishing   house   of  
Voronezh   University, 1985. 34-56   p. 13will can always be said to be a modal auxiliary or whether in its most frequent use it is no
longer modal, with a basic meaning of intention or willingness, but is purely a marker of
future   tense.   Another   English   modal   which   provides   ground   for   debate   is   the   auxiliary
can,   in   various   of   its   uses,   most   obviously,   its   ability   use.   One   use   of   ability   can   is
essentially superlative to the English aspectual paradigm. In the absence of an acceptable
progressive form of verbs of inert perception such as hear, see, smell . I am hearing the
sea   and certain  uses   of   state  cognition verbs  such  as  understand,  English  uses  can  plus
infinitive   instead.   Thus,   what   is   literally   a   statement   of   ability,   I   can   hear   the   sea,   is
interpreted more or less directly as equivalent to a progressive interpretation of I hear the
sea. This use of can is   often argued to be non-modal. More controversial is the normal
use of can with ability meaning. A sentence such as Tommy can reach the door handles
now may be seen not so much as giving a speaker’s judgement about the likelihood of a
situation   actualising   as   making   a   factual   statement   about   Tommy’s   ability.   Palmer
comments: ‘Dynamic ability is less central to modality than deontic permission in that it
does not involve the speaker’s attitude to the factuality or actualisation of the situation’.
Indeed,   Steele   claims   that   ability   can   is   not   a   modal   because   it   only   describes   “the
potential”   of   the   subject referent rather   than the   likelihood of   the   situation.
However,   Quirk   classification   of   ability   meaning   alongside   meanings   reflecting
‘human judgement of what is or is not likely to happen’   gives us a clue to an alternative
analysis,   one   in   which   asserting   or   questioning   someone’s   ability   to   do   something   is
equivalent  to an   assessment  of  the likelihood that  something will  happen. It  is arguable
that if I say Tommy can reach the door handles now, this amounts to a judgement about
the   likelihood   of   the   subject   referent’s   carrying   out   the   action   referred   to   in   the   VP   if
Tommy   can   reach   the   door   handles   then   the   likelihood   is   that   he   will   reach   the   door
handles at the next opportunity. More recently, Salkie has argued that can communicates
enablement, which crucially involves causality rather than modality, if the semantic core
of   modality   is   non-factuality.   Finally,   mention should   be   made   of   evidentiality. For   some, 14evidentiality is a category of meaning: “Evidentiality concerns the speaker’s indication of
the nature (the type and quality) of the evidence invoked for (assuming the existence of)
the  state   of   affairs   expressed   in   the  utterance.”   On  this   view,   the  verb   ‘hear’   in   I   hear
Kate passed the exam is a marker of evidentiality (as well as having, to a variable degree,
its meaning as a verb of perception meaning). For others, evidentiality is more narrowly
defined   as   the   “grammatical   marking   of   information   source”   Aikhenvald,   that   is,   as   a
formal category, on a par with tense as the grammatical encoding of time. On this view,
evidentiality   is   not a   category   which applies   to   English. 6
A distinction is often made between direct and indirect evidentiality, depending on
whether the speaker has personally witnessed the situation or not. In the latter case, the
proposition   expressed   may   be   the   result   of   an   inference   or   involve   a   reported   state   of
affairs. In English, unlike in certain other languages, evidentiality (on the former of the
two   definitions   above),   if   it   is   expressed,   is   expressed   lexically:   the   speaker   explicitly
refers   to   the   evidence   that   is   at   the   origin   of   the   proposition   that   is   expressed.   An
example of direct evidentiality in English would thus be She seems tired and an example
of indirect evidentiality would be: He told me there was a stranger on the opposite side of
the   street.   There   has   been   considerable   debate   as   to   whether   evidentiality   is   another
modal category on a par, with, for instance, epistemic modality, or is a type of epistemic
modality, or is not a modal category at all. For a brief summary of some of the positions
taken,   see   Whitt.   In   linguistics,   the   study   of   modality   involves   examining   the   ways   in
which   speakers   express   their   attitudes,   beliefs,   and   judgments   about   the   likelihood   or
necessity  of events or  states.  There are several  theoretical problems  related to modality
and the classification   of modal   meaning,   including:
1. Modal   ambiguity:   One   of   the   challenges   in   studying   modality   is   the   presence   of
ambiguity   in   modal   expressions.   For   example,   a   sentence   like   "She   might   go   to   the
6
  Bondarko,   A.   B.   Theory   of functional   grammar.   Temporality   Modality. Leningrad:   Nauka   ,1999.   123-231   p 15party" can be interpreted as expressing possibility, permission, or uncertainty, depending
on  the   context.   Disentangling   these   different   meanings   and   classifying   them   accurately
can   be complex.
2. Modal polysemy: Modal verbs and expressions often have multiple meanings that are
related   but   distinct.   For   instance,   the   modal   verb   "can"   can   indicate   ability   ("She   can
swim"),   permission   ("You   can   go   now"),   or   possibility   ("It   can   rain   tomorrow").
Distinguishing between these different senses of modality and determining how they are
related poses   a   challenge for   linguistic   analysis.
3. Modal   gradation:   Modal   meanings   can   vary   in   terms   of   strength   or   certainty.   For
example, "He must be at home" expresses a higher degree of certainty than "He might be
at home." Classifying and categorizing these gradations of modality can be difficult, as
they   are   often   context-dependent and   subjective. 7
4. Modal   markers:   Modal   meanings   can   be   expressed   through   a   variety   of   linguistic
markers,   including   modal   verbs,   adverbs,   adjectives,   particles,   and   constructions.
Determining which markers are prototypical of modal expressions and how they interact
with   each   other   in   conveying   modal   meaning   is   a   key   theoretical   issue   in   the   study   of
modality.
5. Modal   semantics:   Theoretical   debates   exist   regarding   the  nature   of   modal   semantics
and   how   modal   meanings   are   derived.   Some   linguistic   theories   posit   that   modality   is
grounded in logical necessity and possibility, while others emphasize the role of speaker
attitudes and   beliefs in   shaping modal   expressions.
6. Modal   typology:   Different   languages   exhibit   variation   in   the   ways   they   express
modality,   leading   to   questions   about   cross-linguistic   typologies   of   modal   systems.
Studying how modal meanings are encoded and categorized in diverse linguistic systems
can   shed   light   on   universal   principles   of   modality   and   language   structure.   Overall,   the
7
  Didkovskaya, E.   A.   Means   of modality   in   the   sentence   and   the   text.   1991.   67-89 p. 16theoretical   study   of   modality   involves   grappling   with   these   and   other   complex   issues
related   to   the   classification,   interpretation,   and   representation   of   modal   meanings   in
language. By addressing these challenges, linguists can gain insights into how speakers
convey   their   perspectives   on   reality   through modal   expressions 8
.
Theoretical   problems   related   to   modality   and   the   classification   of   modal   meaning
are   important   in   a   text   for   several   reasons.   Understanding   the   different   meanings   and
nuances   of   modal   expressions   can   help   ensure   clarity   and   precision   in   communication.
By   accurately   classifying   modal   meanings,   writers   can   convey   their   intended   attitudes,
beliefs, and judgments more effectively to readers. Modal expressions play a crucial role
in   guiding   readers'   interpretations   and   inferences   about   the   information   presented   in   a
text.   By   grappling   with   theoretical   issues   related   to   modality,   writers   can   shape   how
readers understand the likelihood, necessity, or possibility of events or states described in
the text. The use of modal expressions can have rhetorical effects on the tone, style, and
persuasiveness of a text. By considering the theoretical complexities of modality, writers
can strategically employ modal markers to convey confidence, uncertainty, speculation,
or   other   rhetorical   stances   to   engage   and   persuade   readers.   Modal   meanings   are   often
context-dependent and can vary based on the specific linguistic, cultural, and situational
contexts  in  which   they   occur.  By  addressing   theoretical   challenges   related   to  modality,
writers can enhance their awareness of how modal expressions are shaped by context and
tailor   their   language   use   accordingly   for   different   audiences   and   purposes.   Exploring
theoretical   issues   in   modality   can   shed   light   on   the   diversity   of   modal   systems   across
languages and cultures. Writers who engage with cross-linguistic typologies of modality
can   gain   insights   into   how   different   linguistic   traditions   encode   and   categorize   modal
meanings,   enriching   their   understanding   of   language   variation   and   universals.
Theoretical   problems   in   modality   invite   critical   reflection   on   the   nature   of   language,
8
  Halliday, M.   A.   K.   Functional diversity   in   language   as   seen   from   a   consideration   of   modality   and   mood   in   English .  
1970.   23-67   p. 17cognition,   and   communication.   By   grappling   with   questions   about   modal   ambiguity,
polysemy, gradation, semantics, and typology, writers can deepen their understanding of
how   language   structures thought and shapes our   perspectives   on   reality.
Conclusion   on chapter   I
In   sum,   theoretical   issues   related   to   modality   and   the   classification   of   modal
meaning   are   significant   for   writers   seeking   to   communicate   effectively,   engage   readers
thoughtfully,   and   navigate   the   complexities   of   language   use   in   diverse   contexts.   By
grappling with these challenges, writers can enhance their linguistic awareness, rhetorical
skills,   and   critical   thinking   abilities   to   craft   more   nuanced   and   impactful   texts.   Modality
refers   to   the   manner   or   method   in   which   something   is   done   or   occurs.   In   the   context   of
communication   and   language,   modality   encompasses   the   ways   in   which   attitudes   or
judgments   are   expressed,   such   as   possibility,   necessity,   ability,   and   permission.   Some
unique   features   of   modality   include:   Expressing   degrees   of   certainty:   Modality   allows
speakers   to   indicate   their   level   of   certainty   or   doubt   about   a   statement.   For   example,
modal   verbs   like   "may,"   "might,"   "could,"   "should,"   and   "must"   can   be   used   to   convey
different   levels   of   certainty   or   possibility.   Expressing   obligation   and   necessity:   Modality
can   be   used   to   convey   requirements,   obligations,   or   necessity.   For   instance,   modal   verbs
like   "must,"   "should,"   and   "have   to"   are   often   used   to   express   obligation   or   necessity.
Expressing   ability   and   permission:   Modality   also   allows   speakers   to   convey   ability,
permission,   or   lack   of   ability.   Modal   verbs   like   "can,"   "could,"   "may,"   and   "might"   are
commonly   used   to   express   these   meanings.   Expressing   wishes   and   desires:   Modality   can
be   used   to   express   wishes,   desires,   or   intentions.   Modal   verbs   like   "would,"   "could,"   and
"will"   can   be   used   in   this   context   to   indicate   a   speaker's   preferences   or   aspirations.
Overall,   modality   plays   a   crucial   role   in   shaping   the   meaning   and   tone   of
communication   by   providing   nuanced   ways to   express   attitudes,   opinions,   and   judgments. 18CHAPTER   II THE   IMPORTANCE   OF   MODALITY   IN   MODERN   ENGLISH
2.1 The   uses   of   modality   and   mood   in   Modern   English   language
Modality  and mood  are essential   linguistic  features  in  Modern English  that  play  a
crucial   role   in   expressing   attitudes,   beliefs,   and   judgments   about   the   world.   Here   are
some   key   uses of modality   and mood   in Modern   English   language:
1. Expressing certainty and uncertainty: Modality allows speakers and writers to indicate
the degree of certainty or uncertainty regarding a statement. Modal verbs such as "must,"
"may," "might," "could," "should," and "would" are commonly used to convey different
levels of certainty or possibility. For example, "She must be at  home" expresses a high
degree   of   certainty,   while   "She   might   be   at   home"   suggests   a   lower   level   of   certainty.
2. Expressing   necessity   and   obligation:   Modality   is   also   used   to   convey   necessity,
obligation,   or   permission.   Modal   verbs   like   "must,"   "have   to,"   and   "should"   are   often
used   to   express   requirements   or   duties.   For   instance,   "You   must   study   for   the   exam"
indicates   a   strong   obligation,   while   "You   should   study   for   the   exam"   suggests   a
recommendation or advice.
3. Expressing ability and permission: Modality can be used to indicate ability, permission,
or   capability.   Modal   verbs   such   as   "can,"   "could,"   and   "may"   are   commonly   used   to
express   these   meanings.   For   example,   "She   can   speak   French"   indicates   her   ability   to
speak   French,   while   "You   may   leave   early"   gives   permission   to   leave   before   the   usual
time.
4. Expressing   volition   and   intention:   Modality   can   also   convey   volition,   intention,   or
desire. Modal verbs like "will," "shall," and "want to" are used to express these meanings.
For instance, "I will help you with your project" shows willingness to assist, while "She
wants to   go   on   vacation" expresses   a   desire   or intention.
5. Expressing   politeness   and   indirectness:   Modality   can   be   used   to   soften   statements,
make   requests   more   polite,   or   convey   indirect   meanings.   Modal   expressions   such   as 19"could   you,"   "would   you   mind,"   and   "may   I"   are   often   used   for   this   purpose.   For
example,   "Could   you   pass   me   the   salt,   please?"   is   a   polite   request   for   someone   to   pass
the   salt 9
.
6. Expressing hypothetical  and counterfactual  situations:  Modality is used to talk about
hypothetical   or   counterfactual   situations   that   may   not   be   true   in   reality.   Modal
expressions   like   "if   I   were   you,"   "I   wish,"   and   "had   I   known"   are   used   to   discuss   unreal
or imagined scenarios. For instance, "If I were you, I would take the job offer" presents a
hypothetical   situation   based   on   a   different   perspective.
Overall, modality and mood in Modern English language serve various functions in
expressing   attitudes,   beliefs,   intentions,   and   relationships   between   speakers   and   their
discourse.   By   understanding   the   uses   of   modality   and   mood,   speakers   and   writers   can
effectively   convey   their   intended   meanings   and   engage   with   others   in   diverse
communicative   contexts.   Sure!   Here   are   a   few   examples   of   how   modality   can   be
expressed in a sentence using modal verbs:  1. Certainty: She must be the new manager.
(expressing   high   certainty).   The   meeting   may   start   late.   (expressing   possibility).2.
Necessity   and   obligation:   You   have   to   submit   your   report   by   Friday.   (expressing
obligation).   Students   should   attend   all   classes.   (expressing   recommendation).   3.   Ability
and   permission:   He   can   play   the   guitar   very   well.   (expressing   ability).   May   I   borrow
your   pen?   (asking   for   permission).   4.   Volition   and   intention:   I   will   call   you   later.
(expressing   intention).   She   wants   to   visit   her   grandparents   this   weekend.   (expressing
desire).   5.   Politeness   and   indirectness:   Could   you   please   pass   me   the   salt?   (polite
request).   Would   you   mind   closing   the   window?   (polite   request).   6.   Hypothetical   and
counterfactual situations:   If I were rich, I would travel the world. (hypothetical situation).
I   wish   I   had   studied   harder   for   the   exam.   (counterfactual   situation).   These   examples
demonstrate   how   modal   verbs   and   expressions   are   used   to   express   different   shades   of
9
  Holmes,   J .Doubt   and certainty   in   ESL   textbooks,   Applied   Linguistics,   1988.   1-7   p. 20meaning   related to modality in   sentences.  You   may have   come   across the terms   mood
and modality and wondered what is the difference between them. Mood is a grammatical
notion, whereas modality is a semantic notion relating to such concepts as ‘possibility’,
‘necessity’,   ‘permission’,   ‘obligation’,   etc.   Traditionally,   modality   is   said   to   be
implemented   grammatically   through   three   moods   namely   indicative,   imperative   and
subjunctive. These three moods are then implemented as verb inflections. The indicative
is   used   in   sentences   or   clauses   that   are   typically   used   to   make   factual   statements,   as   in
this example: The sun rises at 6:00 a.m. tomorrow morning. Here we have a present tense
third   person   singular   -s   ending   on   the   verb   rise,   and   traditionally   this   is   said   to   show
indicative mood. For regular lexical verbs we also have a past tense inflection, namely -
ed.   The   imperative   mood   is   described   as   the   form   of   a   verb   that   is   normally   used   in
directing   or commanding   people   to   do something. 10
In an earlier post I discussed the subjunctive mood, and said that many grammarians
would now argue that English doesn’t have it, because the verbs that are used to form the
English   ‘subjunctive’   do   not   have   any   dedicated   verbal   inflections.   Despite   this   the
National   Curriculum   does   mention   the   subjunctive   in   its   Glossary,   here.   If   you   think
about   it,   the   same   is   true   for   the   imperative:   there   are   no   special   verb   endings   for   the
imperative. English simply uses the plain (or base) form of the verb. For this reason it’s
better   to   say   that   English   doesn’t   have   an   imperative   mood,   but   to   speak   instead   of
imperative   clauses.   These   are   clauses   that   normally   lack   a   Subject.   Well,   there’s   a   case
for saying that English does have an indicative mood. However, it’s only reflected in the
third person singular  present  tense  -s  ending on lexical  verbs, and in the past  tense  -ed
ending   for   regular   lexical   verbs.   So   really,   there   isn’t   much   left   by   way   of   of   an
indicative   mood   either   in   English.   Instead,   grammarians   now   often   prefer   to   speak   of
declarative   clauses   which   usually   make   factual   statements.   Modality   and   mood   are   two
10
 Miloserdova, E. V. Pragmatic aspects of modality of a simple sentence in the modern German language. 1991. 55-
76   p. 21linguistic   concepts   that   are   often   confused   with  each   other.   However,  they   are   actually
quite   different.   Modality   refers   to   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   the   proposition
expressed   in   the   sentence,   while   mood   refers   to   the   type   of   sentence   (indicative,
imperative, or subjunctive). Modality can be expressed  in a number of ways, including
modal verbs (can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would), modal auxiliaries
(do,   have),   and   modal   adverbs   (possibly,   probably,   certainly).   Mood,   on   the   other   hand,
is typically expressed by the verb form. The indicative mood is used to make statements
about   reality.   The   imperative   mood   is   used   to   give   commands   or   make   requests.   The
subjunctive mood is used to express wishes, possibilities, or conditions contrary to fact.
Modality and mood can be combined in a variety of ways. For example, the modal verb
"can"   can   be   used   in   the   indicative   mood   to   make   a   statement   about   ability   ("I   can
swim"),   or   it   can   be   used   in   the   subjunctive   mood   to   express   a   possibility   ("If   I   could
swim,   I   would   go   to   the beach 11
").
Modality   and   mood   are   both   important   concepts   in   English   grammar.   By
understanding   the   difference   between   them,   you   can   better   understand   the   meaning   of
sentences and how to use them effectively. Modality is a complex grammatical feature,
but   it   is   an   important   one.   It   allows   speakers   to   express   their   attitudes   towards   the
propositions   they   are   expressing,   and   it   can   be   used   to   create   a   variety   of   different
meanings. Here are some examples of how modality can be used in English: "I can go to
the store." (This sentence expresses the speaker's ability to go to the store.) "You may go
to the store." (This sentence expresses the   speaker's permission for the listener to go to
the store.)     "He must go to the store." (This sentence expresses the speaker's obligation
for the listener to go to the store.) "She should go to the store." (This sentence expresses
the   speaker's   recommendation   for   the   listener   to   go   to   the   store.)   "We   will   go   to   the
store."   (This   sentence   expresses   the   speaker's   intention   to   go   to   the   store.)   "They   would
11
  Mironov,   H.   H.   Means   of   subjective   modality   in   the   scientific   text. Moscow.   1991.   12-19   p 22go to the store." (This sentence expresses the speaker's willingness to go to the store.) All
world   languages   differ   in   structure,   grammar   and   other   parameters,   but   the   concept   of
modality   is   in   all   languages.   Comparison   of   languages   with   lexical   and   grammatical
structures is extremely important to   study them, in terms of configuration and the cross-
section   of   applications.   Assessment   of   the   authenticity   of   the   events   in   the   world   is   one
of   the   basic   qualities   of   human   existence,   its   activity   and   understanding   of   the   world,
and is critical for survival. Modality is a multidimensional phenomenon, and therefore, in
the linguistic literature there are different opinions about   the nature of this phenomenon.
Opinions   of   researchers   differ   on   the   status   of   modal   verbs.   Some   believe   they   are
auxiliaries,   and   others   consider   them   as independent   verbs.
Universal   way   of   expressing   modality   is   by   verbs   and   proper   grammatical
structures.   Also,  modal  words  are distinguished   by their  modal   shades,   namely for   the
fact   that   they   express.   The   structure   of   the   sentences   offers   the   following   grammatical
peculiarities of its existence, which allows identification of what is reported, or actually
carried   out   in   or   thought   that   it   may   be   desirable,   such   that   to   happen,   or   is   required.
There are difficulties in translating the lexical and grammatical level on modal words that
are often found in the instructions. Means of expressing modality:   Using phonetic means
(phonetic   and   logical   accents).   Using   lexical   means   (modal   words   and   composites);
Using lexical and grammatical means. Lexical means of expression modality are modal
words,   parenthesis   with   modal   meaning.   Grammatical   meaning   expresses   a   subjective
relation   through   modal   verbs   (necessarily,   preferably,   allowed,   no   need,   undesirable,
prohibited). The specific instructions are characterized by subjective modality, which is
expressed by   lexical   and   grammatical   means.
2.2 Role   of   adverbs   and   adjectives   in   expressing   modality
Modality is a grammatical category that expresses the speaker's attitude towards the
truth   of   a   proposition.   It   can   be   expressed   through   modal   verbs,   modal   auxiliaries,   and 23modal adverbs. Modal verbs are verbs that express possibility, necessity, or permission.
They   include   can,   could,   may,   might,   must,   shall,   should,   will,   and   would.   Modal
auxiliaries are verbs that are used to help other verbs express modality. They include be
able to, be going to, be likely to, be supposed to, have to, need to, and used to. Modal
adverbs are adverbs  that  express  modality. They include certainly, definitely,  probably,
possibly, surely, and undoubtedly. Adjectives can also be used to express modality. They
include   certain,   possible,   probable,   and   necessary.   Here   are   some   examples   of   how
modality   can   be   expressed   in   English:   I   can   swim.   (ability)   You   must   go   to   school.
(obligation)   She may be late. (possibility)   We should help each other. (obligation) They
are certainly going to win. (certainty) I am definitely going to the party. (certainty)   It is
probably going to rain. (probability) It is possible that he is lying. (possibility) You are
surely   mistaken.   (certainty)   There   is no doubt that she   is   guilty. (certainty)
Modality   is   an   important   part   of   English   grammar.   It   allows   speakers   to   express
their   attitudes   towards   the   truth   of   propositions.   Sure,   here   are   some   adverbs   and
adjectives   used   to   convey   degrees   of   certainty   and   possibility:   Adverbs:   certainly,
definitely,   doubtlessly,   evidently,   obviously,   probably,   presumably,   seemingly,   surely,
undoubtedly.   Adjectives:   certain,   clear,   evident,   likely,   probable,   possible,   predictable,
probable,   reasonable,   sure,   undoubted.   These   words   can   be   used   to   express   different
levels   of   certainty   or   possibility.   For   example,   "certainly"   is   used   to   express   a   high
degree   of   certainty,   while   "possibly"   is   used   to   express   a   lower   degree   of   certainty.
Modal   nouns   are   nouns   that   express   possibility,   necessity,   or   permission.   They   include
words like ability, chance, choice, decision, doubt, hope, intention, luck, need, possibility,
probability, reason,  risk,  suggestion,  threat, and  willingness.  Modal  adverbs are adverbs
that   express   possibility,   necessity,   or   permission.   They   include   words   like   certainly,
definitely,   easily,   evidently,   hardly,   likely,   possibly,   probably,   surely,   and   undoubtedly.
Here are some examples of modal nouns and adverbs in use: I have the ability to speak
French.   There   is   a   chance   that   it   will   rain   tomorrow.   You   have   the   choice   of   either 24staying or going. I have made the decision to leave.     I doubt that he will come. I hope
that you will be successful. I have the intention of going to the store. I am lucky to have
found a job.   I need to go to the bathroom. There is a possibility that  we will  win. It is
probable that she will be there. I am sure that you will do well.   There is no doubt that he
is guilty.   I suggest that you go to bed. I threaten to tell your parents if you don't stop. I
am   willing   to   help   you 12
.
Modal   nouns   and   adverbs   can   be   used   in   a   variety   of   ways   to   express   different
meanings. For example, the modal noun "ability" can be used to express the ability to do
something,   the  possibility   of   doing   something,   or   the  permission   to   do  something.   The
modal   adverb   "certainly"   can   be   used   to   express   certainty,   probability,   or   possibility.
Modal   nouns   and   adverbs   are   words   that   express   possibility,   necessity,   or   permission.
They   are   often   used   in   combination   with   other   modal   verbs   to   create   more   complex
meanings.   Modal   nouns   include   words   like   "ability,"   "permission,"   and   "obligation."
Modal adverbs include words like "possibly," "probably," and "certainly." Modal nouns
and adverbs can be used to express a variety of meanings. For example, "ability" can be
used   to  express   the  ability   to  do   something,   as   in  "I   have   the   ability  to   speak   French."
"Permission"   can   be   used   to   express   permission   to   do   something,   as   in   "You   have   my
permission to leave." "Obligation" can be used to express an obligation to do something,
as in "I am obligated to help you." Modal nouns and adverbs can also be used to express
possibility,   necessity,   or   certainty.   For   example,   "possibly"   can   be   used   to   express   the
possibility   of   something   happening,   as   in   "It   is   possibly   that   it   will   rain   today."
"Probably"   can   be   used   to   express   the   probability   of   something   happening,   as   in   "It   is
probably that you will pass the test." "Certainly" can be used to express certainty about
something,   as   in   "I   am   certain   that   you   will   succeed."   Modal   nouns   and   adverbs   are   a
valuable   tool   for   expressing   modality   in   English.   They   can   be   used   to   create   a   variety   of
12
  Panfilov,   V.   Z.   The   category   of   modality   and   its   role   in   the   constitutional   structure   of   sentences.   Issues   of  
Linguistics,   1977. 36–48   p. 25meanings,   and   they  can   be   used   in  combination   with  other   modal   verbs   to  create   even
more   complex   meanings 13
.
Modal   verbs   are   a   type   of   auxiliary   verb   that   are   used   to   express   possibility,
necessity, permission, or ability. They are different  from other verbs in that they do not
take an infinitive form after  them. The most  common modal  verbs are can, could, may,
might, must, shall, should, will, and would. Can is used to express ability or permission.
For   example,   "I   can   speak   English."   or   "Can   I   borrow   your   pen?"   Could   is   used   to
express   possibility   or   polite   requests.   For   example,   "I   could   go   to   the   store."   or   "Could
you   help   me?"   May   is   used   to   express   permission   or   possibility.   For   example,   "May   I
come in?" or "It may rain today." Might is used to express possibility or uncertainty. For
example,   "You   might   be   right."   or   "I   might   go   to   the   store."   Must   is   used   to   express
necessity or obligation. For example, "You must go to school." or "I must study for my
test."   Shall   is   used   to   express   future   intention   or   obligation.   For   example,   "I   shall   go   to
the   store."   or   "You   shall   do   your   homework."   Should   is   used   to   express   advice   or
obligation. For  example,  "You  should  go to the  doctor." or  "You  should  study  for   your
test." Will is used to express future intention or prediction. For example, "I will go to the
store." or "It  will  rain today."Would is used to express  past  intention or  possibility. For
example,   "I   would   go   to   the   store."   or   "It   would   rain   today."   Modal   verbs   can   also   be
used in negative and interrogative sentences. For example, "You cannot go to the store."
"Can you go to the store?" Modal verbs are a very important part of the English language.
They are used to express a variety of meanings, and they can be used in a variety of ways.
Modality   is   a   grammatical   category   that   expresses   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   the
proposition expressed in the sentence. It can be expressed in a variety of ways, including
modal   verbs,  modal  auxiliaries,  and  modal  adverbs.   Modal  verbs   are   verbs   that   express
possibility,   necessity,   or   permission.   They   include   can,   could,   may,   might,   must,   shall,
13
  Vinogradov,   V.   V.  On   the   category   of modality   and   modal   words   in   English. 1975.   56-78   p. 26should,   will,   and   would.   Modal   auxiliaries   are   verbs   that   are   used   to   help   other   verbs
express modality. They include be able to, be going to, be likely to, be supposed to, have
to, need to, and used to. Modal adverbs are adverbs that express modality. They include
certainly,   definitely, probably,   possibly,   probably,   surely,   and   undoubtedly.
Modality can also be expressed through the use of intonation. For example, a rising
intonation  can   be   used   to  express   uncertainty,   while   a  falling  intonation   can  be   used   to
express certainty. Having analyzed lexical  means of modality, we can conclude that the
use of modal words is quite multifaceted. Modal words have various additional functions:
intensifying,   attracting   attention,   denial,   clarification,   approval,   and   disapproval.   They
allow   for   classification   of   utterances   as   real   or   unreal.   Thus,   specificity   of   the   modal
meaning is due to the degree of reliability of the utterance in relation to reality. The issue
is relevant  and requires further  research on English modality. Conditional  sentences  are
often used to express modality, which refers to the speaker's attitude towards a situation,
indicating   possibility,   necessity,   or   likelihood.   The   three   main   types   of   conditionals   are
the   zero   conditional,   the   first   conditional,   and   the   second   conditional.   Let's   explore   each
of  them  in  the  context   of  expressing   hypothetical  or   imagined  situations   and  discussing
their   possibilities.
1. Zero Conditional.   Structure: If + present simple, present simple. Example: If you heat
water   to   100   degrees,   it   boils.   Usage:   The   zero   conditional   is   used   to   express   general
truths or scientific facts. It implies that the result always happens when the condition is
met. In this case, the condition (heating water to 100 degrees) always leads to the result
(water   boils),   reflecting certainty   and regularity   in   the   situation.
2. First   Conditional:   Structure:   If   +   present   simple,   will   +  base   form.       Example:   If   it
rains   tomorrow,   I   will   bring   an   umbrella.   Usage:   The   first   conditional   is   used   to   talk
about   real   possibilities   and   likely   events   in   the   future.   It   expresses   situations   that   are
probable   or   certain   to   happen   based   on   a   specific   condition.   In   this   case,   the   speaker
believes   that   there   is   a   high   chance   of   rain   tomorrow   and   is   preparing   accordingly   by 27planning   to   bring   an   umbrella.
3. Second   Conditional:   Structure:   If   +   past   simple,   would/could/might   +   base   form.
Example:   If   I   had   more   time,   I   would   travel   around   the   world.   Usage:   The   second
conditional   is   used   to   talk   about   hypothetical   or   imaginary   situations   in   the   present   or
future. It expresses unreal or unlikely situations and their possible outcomes. In this case,
the   speaker   is   imagining   a   scenario   where   they   have   more   time   and   considering   what
they would do in that situation, highlighting the possibility but also the improbability of
the   event   occurring.   Overall,   conditional   sentences   play   a   crucial   role   in   expressing
modality   through   hypothetical   or   imagined   situations   by   indicating   the   likelihood,
certainty,   or   possibility   of   events   based   on   specific   conditions.   By   understanding   the
nuances   of   each   conditional,   speakers   can   convey   their   attitudes   towards   potential
outcomes   and   express   various   levels   of   certainty   or   uncertainty   in   different   contexts.
Phrasal   modals   are   expressions   that   combine   modal   verbs   (such   as   can,   could,   may,
might,   should,   would,   etc.)   with   adverbs   or   prepositions   to   convey   subtle   nuances   of
meaning   and   modality   in   a   sentence.   These   combinations   offer   more   nuanced   ways   to
express possibilities, abilities, permissions, and obligations. Let's explore some common
phrasal modals   and   their functions   in a   sentence:
1. "Must   have":   Function:   Expressing   deduction   or   certainty   about   a   past   event.
Example:   She   must   have   forgotten   about   the   meeting.   (Indicates   a   strong   belief   or
deduction that   she forgot   the   meeting.)
2. "Would   rather":   Function:   Expressing   preference   or   choice   between   two   options.
Example:   I   would   rather   stay   home   than   go   out   tonight.   (Expresses   the   speaker's
preference   for staying   home.)
3. "Could   have":   Function:   Indicating   possibility   or   ability   in   the   past.   Example:   They
could   have   arrived   early   if   they   had   left   on   time.   (Indicates   a   missed   opportunity   or
possibility   that   they   could   have   arrived   early.)
4. "Might   as   well":   Function:   Suggesting   a   course   of   action   that   is   not   the   best   but   is 28acceptable. Example: Since we're already here, we might as well stay for a bit. (Suggests
that staying a   bit longer is a   reasonable   or acceptable   decision.)
5. "Needn't have":   Function: Expressing unnecessary past action.   Example: You needn't
have come to the airport; the flight was   delayed. (Indicates that it was unnecessary for
the   person   to   come since   the flight   was   delayed.)
6. "Shouldn't have": Function: Expressing regret or disapproval of a past action. Example:
He shouldn't  have spoken to her  like that;  it  was very rude. Conveys  disapproval  of  his
past   behavior.
Conclusion   on   chapter II
Phrasal   modals   add   complexity   and   nuance   to   the   expression   of   modality   in   a
sentence   by   combining   modal   verbs   with   other   words   to   convey   specific   shades   of
meaning related to possibility, necessity, obligation, preference, or regret. Understanding
the   functions   of   phrasal   modals   can   help   speakers   communicate   more   precisely   and
effectively  in various  contexts.  In grammar  and  semantics,  modality  refers  to linguistic
devices   that   indicate   the   degree   to   which   an   observation   is   possible,   probable,   likely,
certain,   permitted,   or   prohibited.   In   English,   these   notions   are   commonly   (though   not
exclusively)   expressed   by   modal   auxiliaries,   such   as   can,   might,   should,   and   will.
Modality   refers   to  the   way   in   which   language   is  used   to  express   the   speaker's   attitude,
opinion,   or   degree   of   certainty   towards   a   statement.   It   plays   a   crucial   role   in
communication by allowing speakers to convey their beliefs, intentions, and perspectives
effectively. Here are some key reasons why modality is important in language. Modality
allows   speakers   to   indicate   the   level   of   certainty   or   uncertainty   they   have   about   a
statement.   By   using   modal   verbs   such   as   "might,"   "could,"   "may,"   "must,"   or   "will,"
speakers   can convey   varying degrees   of   probability,   possibility, or   necessity. 29CONCLUSION
Modality is a grammatical  feature that expresses  the speaker's  attitude towards the
proposition   expressed   in   the   sentence.   It   can   be   used   to   express   certainty,   possibility,
necessity,   permission,   and   obligation.   There   are   a   number   of   different   ways   to   express
modality in English. Some of the most common modal verbs are can, could, may, might,
must,   shall,   should,   will,   and   would.   These   verbs   can   be   used   to   express   a   variety   of
modal meanings, such as possibility, necessity, permission, and obligation. In addition to
modal   verbs,   there   are   a   number   of   other   ways   to   express   modality   in   English.   These
include   modal   auxiliaries,   modal   adverbs,   and   modal   particles.   Modal   auxiliaries   are
words   like   must,   may,   and   can   that   are   used   to   express   modality.   Modal   adverbs   are
words like probably, possibly, and certainly that are used to express the speaker's attitude
towards the proposition expressed  in the sentence.  Modal  particles  are words like well,
now, and then that are used to add emphasis or to express the speaker's attitude towards
the   proposition   expressed   in   the   sentence.
Modality   is   a   complex   grammatical   feature,   but   it   is   an   important   one.   It   allows
speakers   to   express   their   attitudes   towards   the   propositions   they   are   expressing,   and   it
can   be   used   to   create   a   variety   of   different   meanings.   In   conclusion,   modality   is   a
grammatical   feature   that   expresses   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   the   proposition
expressed   in   the   sentence.   It   can   be   used   to   express   certainty,   possibility,   necessity,
permission, and obligation. There are a number of different ways to express modality in
English,  including modal  verbs,  modal  auxiliaries,  modal  adverbs, and  modal  particles.
Modality   can   also   be   used   to   express   uncertainty   or   possibility.   For   example,   the
sentence   "I   might   go   to   the   store"   expresses   the   speaker's   uncertainty   about   whether   or
not they will go to the store. Modality can also be used to express necessity or obligation.
For example, the sentence "You must go to the store" expresses the speaker's obligation
for   the   listener   to   go   to   the   store.   Modality   can   also   be   used   to   express   permission   or 30prohibition.   For   example,   the   sentence   "You   may   go   to   the   store"   expresses   the   speaker's
permission   for   the   listener   to   go   to   the   store.   The   sentence   "You   may   not   go   to   the   store"
expresses the speaker's prohibition for the listener to go to the store. Modality can also be
used   to   express   advice   or   recommendation.   For   example,   the   sentence   "You   should   go   to
the   store"   expresses   the   speaker's   recommendation   for   the   listener   to   go   to   the   store.
Modality   can   also   be   used   to   express   intention   or   willingness.   For   example,   the
sentence   "We   will   go   to   the   store"   expresses   the   speaker's   intention   to   go   to   the   store.
The   sentence   "We   would   go   to   the   store"   expresses   the   speaker's   willingness   to   go   to   the
store.   Modality   is   a   complex   grammatical   feature,   but   it   is   an   important   one.   It   allows
speakers   to   express   their   attitudes   towards   the   propositions   they   are   expressing,   and   it
can   be   used   to   create   a   variety   of   different   meanings.   Modality   is   a   property   of   a
linguistic   expression   that   indicates   the   speaker's   attitude   towards   the   proposition
expressed.   Modality   can   be   expressed   in   a   variety   of   ways,   including   through   the   use   of
modal   verbs,   modal   auxiliaries,   and   modal   adverbs.   Modality   helps   speakers   express
their   attitudes,   opinions,   beliefs,   and   emotions   towards   a   statement.   Modal   verbs   like
"should,"   "ought to,"   "would,"   and   "can"   allow   speakers   to   communicate   their
preferences,   obligations,   desires,   or   abilities.   Modality   can   be   used   to   soften   requests,
suggestions,   or   commands   to   make   them   more   polite   and   respectful.   Modal   expressions
like "could you," "would you mind," or "may I" help maintain positive social interactions
and   avoid   sounding   too   direct   or   impolite.   In   academic   and   professional   contexts,
modality   is   essential   for   expressing   academic   stance,   hedging   claims,   and   presenting
arguments with caution and precision. It helps writers convey the strength of their claims,
acknowledge   alternative   viewpoints,   and   engage   in   critical   discourse.   Overall,   modality
plays   a   vital   role   in   language   by   allowing   speakers   to   express   their   attitudes,   beliefs,   and
intentions   in   a   nuanced   and   contextually   appropriate   manner.   Understanding   and   using
modality effectively can improve communication, foster effective interpersonal
interactions,   and   enhance   the   clarity   and   persuasiveness   of   written   and   spoken   language. 31LIST   OF   USED   LITERATURE
1 President   Shavkat   Mirziyoyev’s   speech   at   the   festive   event   held   on   Teacher   and
Mentor’s Day-   “Xalq   so’zi”,   2020-100p.
2 Almurzaeva, P. Kh. Modal words in sentences with modal verbs. “Science and Youth”.
In   Materials   of   the   All-Russian   scientific-practical   conference   of   young   scientists,
graduate   students     and     students     of     Chechen     State     University.     2011.     86–90     p.
3 Almurzaeva, P. Kh.     Expression of the future of the German modal verb “wollen” in
the   fiction.   In   Materials   of   the   All-Russian   scientific-practical   conference   "Linguistics
and intercultural communication", dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Chechen State
University,   2018.   27–30   p
4 Ardiansah, D.   Analysis of Modality in Students’ Hortatory Exposition Texts. Systemic
Functional   Grammar Perspective.   Jurnal Pendidikan   Bahasa   ,   2020.   89-100   p.
5 Belyaeva,   E.   I.   Functional   semantic   fields   of   modality   in   English   and   Russian.
Voronezh: Publishing   house   of Voronezh   University,   1985.   34-56   p.
6 Bondarko,   A.   B.   Theory   of   functional   grammar.   Temporality   Modality.   Leningrad:
Nauka   ,1999.   123-231   p.
7 Didkovskaya,   E.   A.   Means   of   modality   in   the   sentence   and   the   text.   1991.   67-89   p.
8   Halliday,   M.   A.   K.   Functional   diversity   in   language   as   seen   from   a   consideration   of
modality   and   mood   in   English   .   1970.   23-67   p.
9   Holmes,   J   .Doubt   and   certainty   in   ESL   textbooks,   Applied   Linguistics,   1988.   1-7   p.
10 Miloserdova, E. V. Pragmatic aspects of modality of a simple sentence in the modern
German language.   1991.   55-76   p.
11 Mironov,  H.  H.  Means  of   subjective   modality  in  the  scientific   text.  Moscow.   1991.
12-19   p.
12 Panfilov, V. Z.   The category of modality and its role in the constitutional structure of
sentences.   Issues   of Linguistics,   1977.   36–48   p. 3213 Vinogradov,   V.   V.   On   the   category   of   modality   and   modal   words   in   English.   1975.
56-78   p.
14 Yang,   S.   A   Systemic   Functional   Study   of   Modality   in   Modern   English.   2021.34-67   p.
INTERNET   RESOURCES
1. https://www.thoughtco.com/expressing-modality-in-english-1692529  
2.https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/modals  
3. https://www.espressoenglish.net/how-to-express-modality-in-english/  
4. https://writers-ink.net/2016/05/expressing-modality-in-english/
5.   https:// www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-modals.htm

Modality in Modern English

Купить
  • Похожие документы

  • Analysis of English and Uzbek poetry
  • Sohaga oid matnlar tarjimasidagi muammolar
  • Tarjimaning lingvistik va nolingvistik aspektlari
  • Ilmiy-texnikaviy tarjima
  • Tarjima nazaryasi va amaliyoti tarixi

Подтвердить покупку

Да Нет

© Copyright 2019-2025. Created by Foreach.Soft

  • Инструкция по снятию с баланса
  • Контакты
  • Инструкция использования сайта
  • Инструкция загрузки документов
  • O'zbekcha