The use of the adjective as a predicate - Английский язык - Дипломные работы

Информация о документе

Цена	9000UZS
Размер	43.1KB
Покупки	0
Дата загрузки	26 Сентябрь 2019
Расширение	doc
Раздел	Дипломные работы
Предмет	Английский язык

The use of the adjective as a predicate

Купить

Introduction……………………………………………………………………..2 Chapter I Main characteristics of the main parts of the sentence…………………8 1.1Subject.....................................................................................................................9 1.2 Simple predicate………………………………………………………………...11 1.4 Compound verbal predicate …………………………………..………………14 1.3 Compound nominal predicate ………………………………….……………..18 Chapter II The use of Adjective as a predicate……………………………………22 2.1 Classification of adjectives …………………………………………..………...24 2.2 Adjective as a compound nominal predicative ……………………………….32 2.3 Adjective as a compound verbal predicative …………………………………36 Conclusion....................................................................................................................39 Literature........

INTRODUCTION Our respected President Islam Karimov's speech at THE LAW OF OLIY MAJLIS and Senat's joint session was 4 -th conception of deepening democratic reforms again and developing the society of citizenship in our country. Each part of these conception are regulation to project the future of our country. The great attention in the conception is paid to the role of the political parties developing the activity of the chambers of Oliy Majlis, the priority of law and other aspects. In this period much attention paid to increase the protection of private property, to form the class of property owners, to strengthen the activity of formers to provide the liberalization of economy, to prepare the comfortable conditions to develop the discretion especially small business, to crest t

liberalization of mass media, to provide freedom of speech. In the condition s of deep socio - cultural transformations which have taken place in Independent Uzbekistan during the transition to market, economy , multiple forms, of property and different social systems , the problem of the formation of citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan, their historical memory an d their education have special significance. All people , especially the e young need a deep appricationed love of the rich heritage of our ancestors and the inexhaustible fund of their philosophical and scientific works. Without the historical experience of one's own nation and national and human values it is impossible to build a great future. That is why the e problem of continuity of the knowledge and spiritual values

and fawning which spawn plots, backbiting, envy, slander the seeking of special advantage, etc. All these distortions of moral values have a common basic namely an egoistic psychology of personality. Distorted morality and ambition very often create a bad moral atmosphere in labor teams. A t the present time, as many hundred years ago, there is conflict between people with different value orientations. Of course, the highest level of moral culture is not panacea for all troubles and mistake. But as a rule, moral culture determines the behavior of persons and their attributes an relationships with other people in society. Common values help people to face complicate, extraordinary situations as active citizens and to be patriots for their own nation. The double morality used by many people

are necessary in our time. is that the theme is not studied thoroughly in theory and in practice. As a result of studying many grammar books we found out that many great scientists such as Barhudarov, Kaushanskaya, B. Ilyish didn’t pay much attention to the problem of the predicate expressed by an adjective. That is why we choose this theme a sour research work. The extensity of studying research work . Many scientists studied the predicate . They gave much opinions about the predicate . But they did not substantiate the adjective predicate theoretically, and practically. And this theme doesn’t studied as a safe research work. So we choose this was as the research work. The aim of the theme . The aim of this theme is to analyze the use of the adjective as a predicate, to find out the basis

A. Karimov scientific works of scientists, artistic literatures . The scientific novelty of the research work:  the problem of the adjective - predicate is settled down theoretically and practically.  the historical experience concerning to this theme is studied.  worked out scientific and methodic recommendations about this research work The scientific and practical importance of the research work : During studying this research work we found out that this theme is not studied thoroughly an d we tried to analyze the adjective predicate theoretically and practically. By studying this research work we succeed to prove the importance of adjective predicate in the sentence. The students of English department, scientific investigators and the persons who are interesting in learning English

Another Russian grammatist K. N. Kachalova gave more information than the other authors. She explained compound nominal predicate and with what it can be expressed. In this part she says that the compound nominal predicate can be expressed by a linking verb and an adjective. She also says that besides the verb to be there are other linking verbs to become, to grow, to get, to turn to seem, to look and others. She gives the following examples: It grew warmer. He is getting old. She turned pale. He looks ill. Besides that only this scientist says that compound verbal predicate is also expressed with the adjective combination and infinitive or gerund. To this rule she gives these examples: I am glad to see you. He is ready to help her. This book is worth to reading. Studying the works of scie

Main characteristics of the main parts of the sentence It is common in grammatical theory to distinguish main parts of a sentence. Besides main and secondary types there is one more elements which are said to stand outside the sentence structure. In starting now to study parts of the sentences in Modern English we will begin by analyzing the principles on which the classification is based. A sentence expresses a complete thought a s opposed a phrase that can give a lot of information, but does not complete the whole thought There two generally recognized main parts of the sentences - the subject and the predicate. All sentences have a subject and predicate. The subject is the person thing, place or idea that the sentence is about and can be a noun, a pronoun, or a noun phrase. The predicat

succeed and to prove the point in a visit majority of cases. We will therefore stick to the division of sentence parts into main and secondary taking the subject and the predicate to be the main, and all the others to be secondary. The questions now arises how are we to define the subject of sentence? The question may also be put in a different way : what criteria do we practically apply when we say that a word (or, sometimes, a phrase) is the subject of a sentence? In trying to give a definition of the subject, we shall have to include in it both general points, valid for languages in general, and specific points connected with the structure of Modern English. Thus the definition of the subject the modern English will only partly not wholly, coincide with its definition, say in Russian. F

been going on for some reason or time about sentences of the following type : It save Hermione a sudden convulsive sensation of pleasure, to see these rich colours under the candlelight. Two views have been put forward concerning such sentence. one is , that the pronoun it at the beginning of the sentence is the formal subject and the real subject is the infinitive. The other view is, that it is the subject of the sentences and the infinitive an opposition to it. There is something to be said on both sides of the question. On the whole , however, the second view seems preferable, as the division of subjects into formal and real ones seems hard to justify in general syntactical theory. 3 As we know have seen , the definition of the subject given here includes mention of the predicate. This

as well. However this statement is very doubtful. As we have seen above there is much to be said in favour of the view that the category of number in the predicate verb is independent of the number n the subject. this is especially confirmed by sentences like "My family are early rises" where the plural number in the link verb shows the plurality of the acting persons, though the subject noun is in the singular. Besides it should be noted that this question of concord or no concord is one that belongs to the level of phrases, not to that of the cord is one that belongs to the level of phrases, not to that of the sentence and its part. Thus, there seems to be no valid reason for thinking that the predicate is in anyway dependant on the subject. The predicate is one of the two main p

types mentioned here do not call for any comment. However, sometimes has to be said on two questions the simple nominal predicate and the limits of the compound verbal predicate. "Priscilla - the mistress of the house, is ridding a newspaper at breakfast. I see Surrey won she said with her mouth full by for crickets. The sun is in Leo that would account for it. " Although the word cricket "cricket " is not mentioned it is quite evident from the words " Surrey" (which he denotes a cricket team) " won " and cricket match. The latter part of Mr. Barbecue brig’s speech who thoroughly English adds another predicative to the first "splendid game " and also with no linking verb to it. If changed into the usually compound nominal predicate pattern, the sente

announcing an attribute" to it or we may think it is a two member clause with, Roberta the subject and announcing the predicate What criterion shall we apply to coose between the two alternatives? If we take it as one member clause it would fall under the same head as some sentences we have considered above, for instances, the one form, (an American tragedy) "Dusk - of a summer night" or like so m any stage directions of the type. A large room (also its it’s predicate-adjective, i have just found one sentence which expressed by the name of my research work), Three chairs and etc. Now the sentence containing Roberta announcing is evidently quite different in character. It tells the fact that Roberta announced that she would leave her hat and coat etc. 4 Much the same may be said

2) escorting. Even the neighborhood of member clause Gun Lodge and Big Bittern , Itself cannot it would seem be taken as proof that the clause Clyde waiting bus is a one - member clause. Such examples are these go a long way to show that the participle, though it is a verbal, not a finite verb form is able to perform by itself a function generally believed to be characterized of finite verb forms only, namely that of predicate. This possibility , as well as, the ability of the infinitive to be in certain circumstances the main part of a one member, should perhaps, he taken, into account in a definition, at these forms and of verbal’s in general. An additional remark may not be out of place here. In analyzing sentence having an infinitive or a participle as predicate have shown the predicat

considerable number of the verb can be followed by an infinitive some of them with other without the participle to among such verbs are: shall, will, should, would, can, may , must, (without to) ought with, want, desire, hate, fear, begin, strt, continue, remember, forget.... Between these phrases and parts of the sentence is of course not the same in all cases. We can at once eliminate the phrases shall should, will would + infinitive which constitute tense or mood forms of the verb, Thus the phrase shall write is a form the forms write writes wrote in its lexical meaning and consequently it is a simple verbal predicate. The phrases with the verbs (can, may,, must, ought) in the letter cause to constitute compound verbal predicate (this is almost universally recognized) But the phrases wi

group his work is a separate (secondary part of the sentence) an object. This shows that the verb begin can be followed by a noun functioning as an object (the name of or same of course applies to a number of other verbs) since the verb begin can take an object there appears to be no reason to deny that an infinitive following this verb is an object as well. We might give here a table based on what is called transformation: began to work - began his work continued to work - continued his work liked to sing - liked songs On the other hand, notable of this kind is possible with such verbs as can, may, must, ought, they cannot under any circumstances be follow by a noun and this is an important differences on which syntactic analysis should be based. Another question of a similar kind arises

WHAT DOES HE MAKE? and the answer would be supplied by the word toys which accordingly is a separate part of the sentence , is this namely an object. If, on the other hand we take the sentence, HE MAKES MISTAKE it would not be possible to ask the question WHAT DOES HE MAKE? and to give mistakes as an answer to it. Consequently, according to this view we can not say that mistakes is a separate part of the sentence and we must conclude that the phrases makes mistakes as a whole is the predicate. However, this sort of argument is not building. The methods of asking questions, though widely used in school language teaching , is not a scientifically valid method of syntactic study. In a number of the cases the choice of the question is arbitrary and there are even cases when no question at all

taken into account and accordingly we will consider the phrases bring up, set and etc. as the predicate of the sentence. The Compound Nominal Predicate . The compound nominal predicate lays consists of a link verb (also called copula) and the predicate which maybe expressed by various parts of speech usually a noun, an adjective, also statute or an adverb (as in the sentences THE LESSON IS OVER) Often enough the predicate is represented by a phrase most usually of the pattern preposition + noun which may or may not be a phraseological unit. Now we must find the characteristic features of a linking verb. It should first of all be noted that the term linking verb (as well as the term copula after which it appears to have been coined) is not a very happy one. The idea of link suggests that it

sea turned longhand etc. It will be readily seen that of them do not always perform this function but may also be predicate in themselves for instance the verb grow in the sentences THE CHILD HAS GROWN or WE GROW POTATOES of course it is only the meaning at the noun following the verb that shows whether the noun is a predicative or an object compare the two sentence. THEY HAVE GROWN FINE YOUNG MAN and WE GROW POTATOES so if we say that a verb is a linking verb this need not necessarily mean that is s always a link verb and cannot perform any other function 5 . To approach the subject of link verb and predicative from another angle, we may say that if a verb i followed by a predicative it is to some extent at least a link verb. The restriction to some extent at least is necessary because th

blood ran cold with the horrid suggestion which naturally prang from these words (Jane Austen) . The lexical meaning of the verb RUB is here almost wholly obliterated a swill also be seen by translating the sentence into Russian or indeed any other language the assesses of the predication is of course contained in the predicative adjective COLD. Let us now look at a few more examples of sentences wuth as predicative coming after a full predicate with secondary parts attached to it SHE HAD SET HER FEET UPON THAT ROAD, A SPOILED SELFISH AND UNTRIED GIRL, FULL OF YOUTH WARM OF EMOTION, EASILY TEWILDERED BY LIFE (Dreiser). A SPOILED SELFISH AND UNTRIED GIRL is as predicative coming after a fully developed predicate group consisting of the predicative itself an object and an adverbial modifier

This is especially true of the verbs FIND, THINK, REPORT as in the sentence he was found guilty, he was reported died and, etc. It may be the verb which as then in its turn followed by a predicate (a noun or an objective) for instance, HE WAS SAID TO BE A GREAT ACTOR, HE WAS REPORTED TO BE DIED etc. As far as meaning is concerned there seems to be no difference between the sentence, he was reported died and he was reported to be died or between the sentence he seemed clever he seemed to be clever and, etc. A s far as the structure is concerned the second variant in each case is some what more complicated in that the finite verb is first followed by an adjective, but which is itself the adjective of a link verb and therefore followed by another predicative. Besides the contraction of differ

gender distinctions. Some adjectives differs materially not only from much highly inflected languages as Russian, Latin and German the adjectives have a rather complicated system of forms, but even from Modern French, which has preserved number and gender distinctions to the present day ( c.f. masculine singular grand, masculine plural grand’s, feminine singular grand, feminine plural grand large). By what signs do we then , recognize an adjective as such in Modern English? In most cases this can be done only by taking into account semantic and syntactical phenomena. but in some cases, that is for certain adjectives , derivative suffixes re significant, too. Among these are the suffix - less (as in useless) , the suffix - like (as in ghostlike) and a few others. Occasionally, however, thou

 Shape adjectives are another example of descriptive adjectives and some are - round, oblong, wavy, crooked, distorted, sleek, spherical, and triangular.  Color adjectives are many in number. They include - purple, white, brownish, pastel, tanned, dark-blue, yellow...  Some adjectives tell the origin of the object such as - Canadian, Indian, Swiss, Spanish, lunar, polar, southern Californian  Another descriptive adjectives tells the materials which the object made of. Examples are - cotton, polyester, glass, plastic, china, metal, teal, wooden...  Purpose adjectives would include words like - work, fishing, racing, swinging, and cooking We should also know that there are many more out there that describe, or modify, nouns and pronouns. Some of these kinds of adjectives would be emotio

Most qualitative adjectives have degrees of comparison: big - bigger - the biggest interesting-more interesting-the most interesting Some qualitative adjectives such as - greensick, darkish, incurable, unsuitable, chief, principal have no degrees of comparison. Qualitative adjectives have certain typical suffixes such as - ful, -less, -ous, -ent, -able, -y, -ish; careful, careless, dangerous, convenient, comfortable, silvery, watery, whitish, shortlist. Qualitative adjectives can be used as attributes and predicative: 1. Thus by the great friendship of the Secretary the whole affair was compromised. (J.S. "G.T" p-76) (attributes) 2. A single, energetic fly irked round the room (P.A "TPOTH" p-91) (attributes) 3. The food is not good (P.A "TPOTH" p-115) (predicative)

Partially substantivized adjectives acquire only some of the characteristics of the noun; they are used with the definite article. Partially substantivized adjectives denote a whole class: the rich, the poor, the unemployed. They may also denote abstract notions: the good, the evil, the beautiful, the singular, the plural... Substantivized adjectives denoting nationalities fall under wholly and partially substantivized adjectives. Wholly substantivized adjectives are a Russian - Russian, a German - Germans. Partially substantivized adjectives are : The English, the French, the Chinese 6 . There is also the question of the opposite phenomenon - that of nouns becoming adjectives. For a variety of reasons, this question presents a number of difficulties and has, accordingly, given rise to pro

The criteria to be applied here are the following : 1has the first element of those phrases number distinctions? 2 Is it able in the cases when it denotes a human being to have a possessive form? 3 does it denote a substance or a property? Strangely enough all these questions are very hard to answer. As to (1) it must be stated that the first element usually appears only in one number form, which is either singular or plural, e.g. stone wall not stones wall; house fronts, not houses fronts; goods van not good van , etc. However that observation leads us nowhere. It is quite possible to argue that the first element is a noun, capable of number distinctions, but always appearing in a definite number form when making part of that phrase. So the application of criterion proves to be inconclusi

we shall not speak of homonyms, or indeed new parts of speech, unless, this is made strictly necessary by indisputable facts, we will stick to the view that the first element of such phrases as stone wall or speech sound is a noun in a special syntactical function. It is this view that appears to be the most plausible. The only morphological problems concerning adjectives is, than that of degrees of comparison. Degrees of comparison. The first question which arises here is , how many degrees of comparison has the English adjective (and, for that matter, the adjective in other language, such as Russian, Latin or German) If we take for example, the three forms, of an English adjective: large, larger, the largest, shall we say that they are , all three of them, degrees of comparison? In that

as poor, pure, rare, sure . Their stems are different and suffixes of the degrees of comparison are added on to these stems, whereas the basic form loses its final -r , unless it is followed without pause by a word beginning with a vowel, as in the phrases poor idea, rare image and the like. Now it is well known that not every adjective has degrees of comparison. This may depend on two factor. One of these is not grammatical but semantic. Since degrees of comparison express a difference of degree in the same property, only those adjectives admit of degrees of comparison which denote properties capable of appearing in different degrees. Thus, it is obvious that, for example, the adjective middle has no degrees of comparison. The same might be said about many other adjectives, such as blind,

do not essentially differ from phrase the type very difficult, which, of course, nobody would think of treating as analytical forms. Let us examine the arguments that have been or may be put forward in favor of one and the other view. The view that formations of the type more difficult are analytical degrees of comparison may be supported by the following considerations : 1 The actual meaning of formations like more difficult, the most difficult does not differ from that of the degrees of comparison larger, the largest. 2 Qualitative adjectives, like difficult, express properties which be present in different degrees, and therefore they are bound to have degrees of comparison. The argument against such formations being analytical degrees of comparison would run roughly like this. No format

be. I t seems on the whole , that the tendency towards making linguistic something like an exact science which we are witnessing today should make us prefer the second view, based on strictly grammatical criteria. If that view is adopted the sphere of adjectives having degrees of comparison in Modern English will be very limited : besides the limitations imposed by the meaning of the adjectives (as shown above) There will be limitation depending on the ability of an adjectives to take the suffixes -er, and -est. 7 A few adjectives do not, as is well known, form any degrees of comparison by means of inflection. Their degrees of comparison by means of inflections. Their degrees of comparison are derived from a different root. these are good, better, best; bad worse worst, and a few more. Sho

article is joined to the superlative form of an adverb, so that there is no noun to which it might, directly or inderectly, be said to belong. Here ia an example from a nine teenth century novel : The world hears most of the former, and talks of them the most but i doubt whether the letter are not the more numerous. (TROLLOPE) There are two phrases includding a superlative form here namely, hears most of the former, and talks of them the most . While there might be some doubt about the grammatical status of the first most (whether it is rather an object, that is , a substantivized adjective, or an adverbial modifier, that is an adverb), the second most gives rise to no such doubts: The verb talk cann not take any object of that kind. So the most id bound to be an adverb and in any case the

article and expresse in that case a very high degree of a property, without implying any comparison, e.g. a most satisfactory result . The meaning of the phrase is thus the same as of the superlative degree in its elative application. The possibility of using the phrase most + adjective with the indefinite article seems to be an additional argument in favour of the view that this is not an analytical form of the superlative but just a free phrase. ADJECTIVE AS A COMPOUND NOMINAL PREDICATE As we mentioned above that the predicate devides into : verbal predicate - (simple and compound) nominal predicate - (simple and compound) 1) If the compound nominal predicate consists of a link verb and an adjective we call thois predicate adlective. A rpedicate adjective is an adjective that follows a l

The performs were wooden brown and un- sinkible (R.S "T I" p- 30) Your gift will be appriciated (R.S "T I" p- 33) And now you see mate , i am pretty low and deaserted by all (R.S "T I" p- 22) The linking verbs are as follows : is, become, seem, grow, turn, prove, look , feel, smeel, taste, sound, appear, stay, keep, an d, remain. When we see one of these verbs in sentence, we have a good chance of finding a predicate adjective in that sentence as well. 2) When finding examples to the adjective predicative we find out that the compound nominal predicate (expresed by an adjective) with linking verrb to be is more spread than the other link verbs. 3) The other linking verbs are as follows : is, become, seem, grow, turn, prove, look , feel, smeel, taste, sound, appear,

It was such a warm, friendly smile, Lanny couldnt returning it .(P.A. "TPOTH" p - 58) Mako o was ev educated man , but...(P.A. "TPOTH" p -58) His muzzle was the long wolf muzzle, save thart it was larger than the muzzle of any wolf. ... (J.L "WF" p - 82) 5) Predicate adjectives can be proper adjectives : Where they Chinese or had they been Chinese at any time?... .(P.A. "TPOTH" p -108) ...but i'm still a Zulu becuse there is Zululand and the language....(P.A. "TPOTH" p - 107) Yes, but it was essentially the Africander poets who had succeede in catching the pirit...(P.A. "TPOTH" p -19) 6) Hyphenated adjectives containing past participle are frequently used as predicate adjectives. For example: The orator was long-winded The belief is wide

HE, SHE, WE, IT, THEY, like I'm happy, You are good and , etc. Having predicate adjectives means that we can describe subjects without putting the adjectives before him. Instead of having to say The good boy followed by a verb, we can simply say The boy is good. In this sentence we can simply say identify that the boy is the subject, is is the linking verb, and good is the predicate adjective. There are som e verbs which though fully preserving theur concrete meaning, perform the function of link verbs and used with the predicate adjecyives. They are : to lie, to sit, to die, to marry, to return, to leave, to come,tostand, to fall, to go, to stay, etc. For example : Miss Maudue and I would sit quietly ion her porch, watchiong the sky go from yellow to red as the sun went down (H. L &#3

nominal preicate , they form a special or a mixed type : predicates of these kind maybe termed double predicates. just how? I was trying not to show how frightene I got. (H. L "TKAMB" p - 13) . Compaer also te followin g sentence such as : I saw hinm go quite white (H. L "TKAMB" p - 25) . The lexicl meaning of the verb go is here almost wholly obliterated, as will also be seen by translating the entence into Uzbek, or indeeed any other languge. The essense of the predication is of course contained in the predicate adjetive white. Let us now look at a few more exmples of sentences with a predicative coming after a full predicate with secomndary parts attched to it. SHE HAD SET HER FEET UPON THAT ROAD, A SPOILED SELFISH AND UNTUIRED girll fullof youth warm of an emotion easil

performing (at least partly) the function of a link verb, may be in the passive voice. This is esspecially true of the verbs to find, to think, to report, as in the sentences He wa sfound gulty, He was reported dead, etc. As far as meaning is comnerned, there are seems to be no difference between the sentence. he was reported dead, and he was reported to be dead or betweenn the sentence he seemed clever and He seemed to be clever. Very often the predicative expressed by an adjective in English does not correspond to an adjective in Uzbek. It often cerrespondes to an adverb, serveing as n adverbial modifier. In this connection particular attention shoulld be paidto the following verb as they are often used in Every day in English: to look, to feel, to sound, to smell, to taste. For examples

It was so hard to remember home..(P.A. "TPOTH" p -28) We would be glad to have you.(H. L "TKAMB" p - 8) . It ios interesting to know what he doea in there.(H. L "TKAMB" p - 5) . In all these exmples we can see compound verbal predicate is expressed by an adjective and infinitive 2)Compound verbal predicate is expressed with the combination of adjective and gerund. For example : One day we were busy playing The Radleys, we did not Atticus standing on the ....(H. L "TKAMB" p -11) . You were so busy looking at the fire......(H. L "TKAMB" p -33) . In the conclusion we can say that adjective predicate is widely used in sentences. It is an important syntactic - semantic structure. It exists in sentences with link verbs an the finite verbs with the meaning

syntactic semantic structure and nalyzed it throughly. In studying the structure of main parts we are faced with the problem of subject and predicate.. We know that the subject and predicte the main parts of the sentences. We were interested how to definite the subject of a sentence. In trying to give a definition of the subject we formulated the structure of definition itself. It is found the contain the following items (1) tyhe meaning of the subject, ie, its relationsto the thought expressed in the sentence; (2) its syntactical reltions in the sentence; (3) its morphological realization. Acording these items we difened the subject like this:  It denotes the thing whose action or hracteristic is expressed by the predicate.  It is not dependent on any other part of the sentence  It may

found out that the predicate maybe be classsified in two ways (1) Structural classification (2) morphological classification. According to the structural to the structural classification the predicate deviede the following types: Simple predicate, Compound predicate According to the morphological classification the predicate is deviede into the the following types: Verbal predicate and Nominal predicate We know that the simple predicate is expressed by a finite verb in a siple or a compound tense form. It generally denotes an action, sometimes it denotes a state which is represented as an action. The compound predicate consists of two parts a finite verb and some other part of speech: a noun , a pronoun, an adjective, a verbal (a participle , a gerund, an infinitive), etc. The second compo

Morphological characteristics of the adjective is that it have dgree of comparioson. Morphological composition of the adjective is adjectives are diveded into simple derivative and compound adjectives:  simple adjective s are adjectives which have neither prefixes nor suffixes : good, red, black..  derivative adjectives are adjectives which have derivative elements , suffixes prefixes or both : beutiful, foolish, unkind...  compound adjectives are adjectiveas built from two or more stems snow - white, life-giving Adjectives classified into two classes: 1. Qualitative adjectives, 2. Realative adjectives. Qualitative adjectives denote qualities of a substance directly no through its relation to another substance, as size, shape , colour physical and mental qualities, qualities of general

and is connected to the subject by what is known a sa linking verb. . The predicate adjectives is linked to thhe subject with a linking verb like: to be, to become, to seem, to grow, to turn, to prove, to look, to feel,to smell, to taste, to sound, to appear, to stay, to keep, to remain, and etc. There some main verbs which loose their concrete meaning and perform the function of link verbs. They are to lie, to sit, to die, to return, to marry, to leave, to come, to stand, to fall, to go and etc. With these main verbs we form adjective predicates and they lose their meaning. besides being the part of compound nominal predicate , adjective predicate can be used in compound verbal predicate also. In compound verbal predicate is expressed with the combination of adjectives and infinitive, som

2. Karimov I. A. Uzbekistan's own way of renovation and progress. Tashkent. Uzbekistan 1992. 3. Karimov I. A. Our way is the way of Independence and Progress. Tashkent. Uzbekistan. 1996. 4. Karimov I. A. Global financial and economic crisis, ways and measures to overcome in Uzbekistan. Tashkent. 5. Uzbekistan. 2008. 6. B . Ilyish . The Structure of Modern English . Leningrad . 1971 . 7. Barxudarov.L.S. " The strucrure of simple sentence present day English" Moscow .1966. 8. Dubrovin.M .1 . Situational Grammar . Moscow - Prosveshcheniye . 1986 9. E . M .Grdon . " A grammar of present-day English " Moscow . 1974 . 10. E .A.Natanson .Practical English Grammar by Correspondence . Moscow . 1973 11. Houghton Mifflin "English grammar and Composition " U.S. 1984. G . Ko

17. Strang .B.M.N. " Modern English Structure " London . 1962 . 18. Zangvoort R. W.A. " A Handbook of English Grammar " Longmans .1958. Original literature . 1.Aldington .Richard " Death of a Hero". Leningrad . 1971 . 2.Abrahams . Peter . " The path of thunder " . Moscow .1971. 3.Balchin. Nigel. " The fall of the Sparrow " . Moscow .1978. 4.Barstow . Stan . " A kind of loving " . Moscow .1973. 44

5.Capote . Truman . " Breakfast at Tiffany's " . Leningrad . 1971 . 6.Cary . Joyce . " Mr Johnson " . Moscow .1968. 7.Christie . Agatha . " Murder in the Mews ". Leningrad .1976. 8.Cooper . William . " Scenes from Married life " .Moscow 1977. 9.Dickens . Monica . " The heart of London " . Leningrad .1982. lO.Durrell. Lawrence . " The Dark Labirinth " . Moscow .1978 11 Galsworthy . John . " The Man of Property " . Leningrad .1971. 12.Green . Grahams . " The quiet American " . Moscow .1979. 13.Golding . William . " Lord of. the flies " . Moscow. 1976. 14."Hartley.L. P. "The Go-Between" . Moscow. 1968. 15.Hemingway . Ernest. "A farewell to Arms". Moscow. 1971. 16.Huxley .Aldous . "Point-Counte

Купить